Statistics
27,405 total views | Who I Am...Latest BlogsNo articles found
Wall - 0 followersLatest NewsNo articles found
| VideosYou can link to any video on RunnerSpace and put it in your video box on your profile! |
Keller's #5 is what's going to hurt them at state. Could very well finish a poor race if even worse one runner runs a subpar race (lack of depth). Still, I think their chances will be hurt by how far back their #5 is.
I see Southlake Carroll finishing ahead of Keller, but behind Kingwood.
So in my opinion:
#1 Marcus (or Kingwood)
#2 Kingwood (or Marcus)
#3 Southlake Carroll
#4 Keller
I think Kingwood could pull out a surprise, though.
Keller's #5 is what's going to hurt them at state. Could very well finish a poor race if even worse one runner runs a subpar race (lack of depth). Still, I think their chances will be hurt by how far back their #5 is.
I see Southlake Carroll finishing ahead of Keller, but behind Kingwood.
So in my opinion:
#1 Marcus (or Kingwood)
#2 Kingwood (or Marcus)
#3 Southlake Carroll
#4 Keller
I think Kingwood could pull out a surprise, though.
Kingwood girl's were missing their #4 runner when they lost to Marcus--- which would have made the race a very close one. It will be a close race at state the next time they meet.
Kingwood girl's were missing their #4 runner when they lost to Marcus--- which would have made the race a very close one. It will be a close race at state the next time they meet.
I won't make excuses for some of the inconsistent performances by some runners on the team (their spread is usually from about a minute or so from 1-7, which wasn't the case at Asics), but I will tell you that the important thing to note is that Southlake Carroll didn't run two of their normal top 5 runners at the meet.
CA is very talented though. There are very few teams in Texas that can compete with Southlake Carroll.
One big thing I would change in the rankings:
The Woodlands should be ranked higher than Southlake Carroll, for sure. Not just that, but they can go past their 7th man on their team and compete with anyone in the nation. Their depth is absolutely incredible, so while we see some runners having off days for Southlake Carroll, the Woodlands can manage to support something like that. Check their district results:
Look at Varsity Boys, JV Boys, and Open Boys. Incredible.
http://tx.milesplit....16#.Vif_lH6rSUk
I won't make excuses for some of the inconsistent performances by some runners on the team (their spread is usually from about a minute or so from 1-7, which wasn't the case at Asics), but I will tell you that the important thing to note is that Southlake Carroll didn't run two of their normal top 5 runners at the meet.
CA is very talented though. There are very few teams in Texas that can compete with Southlake Carroll.
One big thing I would change in the rankings:
The Woodlands should be ranked higher than Southlake Carroll, for sure. Not just that, but they can go past their 7th man on their team and compete with anyone in the nation. Their depth is absolutely incredible, so while we see some runners having off days for Southlake Carroll, the Woodlands can manage to support something like that. Check their district results:
Look at Varsity Boys, JV Boys, and Open Boys. Incredible.
http://tx.milesplit....16#.Vif_lH6rSUk